3 posts tagged “travel”

In less than a week, Team Snarkfox will be in glorious London, England, with all that entails (acute childhood nostalgia, oddly flavored crisps, gawking at things in Liberty, visits to cousins, buckets of tea, the Tate Modern, hemorrhaging money). We haven't been in almost six years, and I can hardly wait. I am filling the time until then with:

• desultory filling-out of forms that must be completed before my job status shifts over to something else, which it will do while we are out of town;
• largely failing to read the things I ought to be reading in preparation for next semester;
• sending occasional work-related emails so that people will be under the mistaken impression that I am getting something done;
• formulating schemes to run away and read novels on the lawn.

I have been feeling somewhat ancient and unaccomplished lately--or rather, naggingly aware of the fact that I should have gotten a good deal more sorted out by now, given the age that I am, and that I'm not going to suddenly get a few years back to get it righter. On the other hand, this state of affairs is hardly a surprising outcome of the habits outlined above, now is it? Also I note that my face appears to have mutated into that of a well-creased yet puffy monkey, which is not heartening. I had hoped to age gracefully, but it seems that unless it turns out that "comic and rubbery" is the height of grace, I am out of luck. Too bad.

But London! London will be extremely heartening, and indeed probably even replete with actual reading of novels on lawns. There are a lot of grassy squares that are eminently suitable for just that very thing. It will be restorative.

Speaking of novels, I keep reading The Fountain Overflows, by Rebecca West, over and over again. I read lots of books more than once, of course, but this is a different, more total and consuming, kind of rereading. There are a number of books that I read and have read this way, often coming to the end and flipping back to the beginning to start over again without standing up in between. Most of the books that fall into this category I read for the first time quite some time ago. The majority date from childhood, when it seems my whole life was consumed by an unbroken stream of reading, and whenever I happened by some circumstance to be forced to do something other than read, my mind was still awash in whatever books I had been reading just before.

The Fountain Overflows I read for the first time only six months ago and I believe I have read it at least six times since then. I wish I felt I had the skill to explain what makes it so entirely compelling to me.

It was written in 1956 but is set about fifty years earlier. The narrator, Rose Aubrey, is one of four children in a family that appears to be almost entirely unfit for the world in which it lives. Their father is brilliant, handsome, mercurial, a political genius, and constitutionally incapable of passing up an opportunity to lose money in the stock market or to bite a hand that feeds him. Their mother, once an accomplished concert pianist, is thin, anxious, nerve-jangled, shabby. To outsiders she seems hopelessly odd, but in fact she is clever and generous, capable of holding the family together and looking after a number of other characters in distress that cross their path.

Rose, her twin sister Mary, and their brother Richard Quin never doubt that where the Aubreys and the outside world diverge, it is infinitely better to be an Aubrey. The oldest child, Cordelia, is built differently. Their oddness and poverty agonize her. She is pretty; she plays the violin in a way that stupider adults think is impressive, though the musical Aubreys know better and are agonized in their turn:

...we would rather have been musical with Mamma than have red-gold curls and make utter fools of ourselves by playing the violin as Cordelia did. We were sorry for Cordelia, particularly now, when Papa, from whom she derived such interest as she possessed, had gone away for six weeks. But all the same she was an ass to think she could play the violin, it was as if Mary and I thought we had red-gold curls.

This gives you some idea of the quality of the writing. The discrepancies between the judgments of the non-Cordelia Aubreys and the judgments of most of the people they come into contact with (in all of which the book sides definitively with Rose) produce the emotional tensions and central drama of the book, though page to page it is filled with small events. Mainly it brilliantly captures what it is to be a child, (thus) relatively powerless, and possessed of very high standards. I love it.

Oh dear, what a ridiculously long post this turned out to be, and with so little holding it together. On the other hand, writing it cheered me up enormously. Since I'm pretty sure that only about three people are going to read it in any case, so be it. Maybe one of you will even read the book and tell me how much you loved it.

I recently bought some snazzy Sennheiser headphones with active noise cancelling. That stuff is amazing, especially when you turn it on without playing anything else to go with it. POOF! I'm deaf! Oh, except for the inconveniently orderly sound of Glenn Beck blathering on the airport TV. Perhaps a little music was called for, after all.

Anyway, almost immediately following my recent purchase of these headphones, I even more recently left them on the plane back from France, and realized it just after we'd emerged from immigration and customs at JFK. We got to the gate for our connecting flight and I explained my dilemma -- very sweetly, I promise! -- to the gate agent. She said, "Oh, you gotta go back to customs." To customs? But we had a plane to catch and customs was very busy and featured no one but wordless form-stampers and armed guards, and furthermore seemed to have only an out and no in. Could I perhaps fill out some kind of form in hopes that they found it later? "You gotta go to customs. Look," she said, with great scorn for my idiocy, "this here is the BOARDING GATE."

Obviously my headphones are long gone, but today I went to the American Airlines customer service website to see what I could find about finding objects that had been left on planes. "If you left an item at the airport or on your flight, you will need to contact the Lost and Found office of the airport from or to which you were traveling," says the website. Okay. But of course -- of course! -- when you call the number for the JFK lost and found office, you get a recording telling you that if you are calling in search of an item left on a plane, you should contact the airline. Sigh.

So I sent American an email explaining this unfortunate situation. In return I've just received an auto-reply:

Thank you for contacting us.  We consider feedback from our customers to be very important.  We are currently experiencing higher than normal email communications from our customers and our response to you may be delayed.

Hooray! Super. Also, do you think that the email communications are "higher than normal" because the customers have been resorting to chemical relief?

Did you know that when you tell people you are going to Paris, they tend to think that you should be looking forward to it? (I'm sure it will be lovely.)

Also, ONCE AGAIN I forgot to put my email address on my handouts, and only noticed after I had made all the copies.